WritingScientific Writing & PublishingLylll9436/Paper-Polish-Workflow-skillPaper Writing & Submission

ppw:logic

Maintainer Lylll9436 · Last updated April 1, 2026

Verify logical consistency across paper sections. Traces argument chains and identifies gaps, unsupported claims, terminology inconsistencies, and number contradictions. 论文逻辑验证，识别论证链断裂、无支撑声明、术语不一致、数字矛盾。.

Claude CodeWritingSubmissionppw-logicpaper-polishwritingsubmission

Original source

Lylll9436/Paper-Polish-Workflow-skill

https://github.com/Lylll9436/Paper-Polish-Workflow-skill/tree/main/skills/ppw-logic

Maintainer: Lylll9436
License: See upstream repo
Last updated: April 1, 2026

Skill Snapshot

Key Details From SKILL.md

2 min

Key Notes

This Skill reads a full academic paper and verifies logical consistency across its sections. It identifies four types of issues — argument chain gaps (AC-), unsupported claims (UC-), terminology inconsistencies (TI-), and number contradictions (NC-) — and produces a two-part bilingual report. Part 1 maps each section's primary claim as an Argument Chain View table, showing how claims connect (or fail to connect) from Introduction through Conclusion. Part 2 categorizes every identified issue with a problem description, an impact statement, and a one-sentence directional suggestion, each followed by an inline Chinese translation. The Skill never rewrites text; it identifies and suggests only.
你是一位负责论文终稿校对的学术助手。你的任务是进行"红线审查"，确保论文没有致命错误。.

Source Doc

Excerpt From SKILL.md

Core Prompt

Source: awesome-ai-research-writing — 逻辑检查


## Constraints

1. 审查阈值（高容忍度）：
   - 默认假设：请预设当前的草稿已经经过了多轮修改与校正，质量较高。
   - 仅报错原则：只有在遇到阻碍读者理解的逻辑断层、引起歧义的术语混乱、或严重的语法错误时才提出意见。
   - 严禁优化：对于"可改可不改"的风格问题、或者仅仅是"换个词听起来更高级"的建议，请直接忽略，不要通过挑刺来体现你的存在感。

2. 审查维度：
   - 致命逻辑：是否存在前后完全矛盾的陈述？
   - 术语一致性：核心概念是否在没有说明的情况下换了名字？
   - 严重语病：是否存在导致句意不清的中式英语（Chinglish）或语法结构错误。

3. 输出格式：
   - 如果没有上述"必须修改"的错误，请直接输出中文：[检测通过，无实质性问题]。
   - 如果有问题，请使用中文分点简要指出，不要长篇大论。

Modes

Mode	Default	Behavior
`direct`	Yes	Single-pass full-paper analysis, no intermediate confirmation steps
`batch`		Not supported — cross-section logic verification requires full-paper context

Default mode: direct. User provides the paper and receives a complete two-part logic report.

Use cases

Use ppw:logic for manuscript drafting and submission workflows.
Apply ppw:logic when polishing research communication outputs.

Not for

Do not treat this catalog entry as a substitute for the full upstream workflow.

Related skills

Back to directory

WritingScientific Writing & Publishing

bio-alignment-io

Read, write, and convert multiple sequence alignment files using Biopython Bio.AlignIO. Supports Clustal, PHYLIP, Stockholm, FASTA, Nexus, a…

OpenClawNanoClawWriting

FreedomIntelligence/OpenClaw-Medical-SkillsView

WritingScientific Writing & Publishing

doc-coauthoring

Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical s…

OpenClawNanoClawWriting

FreedomIntelligence/OpenClaw-Medical-SkillsView

WritingScientific Writing & Publishing

paper-polish-workflow

Systematic top-down workflow for polishing academic papers. Structure to logic to expression with user confirmation at each step.

Claude CodeWriting

Lylll9436/Paper-Polish-Workflow-skillView

WritingScientific Writing & Publishing

ppw:abstract

Generate or optimize academic paper abstracts using the 5-sentence Farquhar formula. Supports generate-from-scratch and restructure-existing…

Claude CodeWriting

Lylll9436/Paper-Polish-Workflow-skillView